Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42615921›Full record

SynthesisEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Ventricular pulsed field ablation from bench to bedside: preclinical and clinical evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paolo Compagnucci, Luca Finori, Michela Casella, Alessio Gasperetti, Henry D Huang, Yari Valeri, Leonardo D'Angelo, Francesca Campanelli, Giorgio Giacomini, Giovanni Volpato and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Paolo CompagnucciCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1924-6548
Luca FinoriCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-7027-9143
Michela CasellaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-1742
Alessio GasperettiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3432-070X
Henry D HuangDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yari ValeriCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0454-0739
Leonardo D'AngeloCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-2118-893X
Francesca CampanelliCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-8717-5190
Giorgio GiacominiCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-9996-9875
Giovanni VolpatoCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5593-3591
Laura CipollettaCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7570-4278
Quintino ParisiCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.
Luigi Di BiaseCardiac Arrhythmia Center, Division of Cardiology at Montefiore-Einstein Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-4047
Andrea NataleSt David's Medical Center, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-0728
Pasquale SantangeliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0023-9666
Antonio Dello RussoCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital 'Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche', Via Conca 71, Ancona 60126, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7737-421X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEvidence supporting the use of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation remains limited and heterogeneous, and the relationship between preclinical lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes is incompletely defined. We sought to systematically summarize preclinical lesion metrics and clinical outcomes of ventricular PFA. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies of ventricular PFA. Preclinical studies reporting lesion depth or transmurality and clinical studies detailing procedural efficacy and safety were included. Random-effects models were used to pool lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes. Seventy-five studies were included (33 preclinical, 43 clinical; 355 patients). In preclinical models, mean lesion depth was 5.96 mm(95%CI, 5.07-6.84) in healthy endocardium and 5.19 mm (95%CI, 2.58-7.79) in healthy epicardium. Notably, lesion depth was quantitatively similar in models of scarred myocardium (5.96 mm; 95%CI, 5.39-6.53). Lesion transmurality was variable in healthy tissues (32%; 95%CI, 15-52%) but higher within scar (53%; 95%CI, 36-70%). Consistently, lesion depth was similar between PFA and RF in healthy myocardium, but greater with PFA in scarred models (within-study mean depth difference, 2.09 mm; 95%CI, 0.84-3.34). Greater contact force, repeated applications, and higher energy/duration settings were associated with increased lesion depth. Clinically, acute success was high for both premature ventricular complexes (PVCs,90%; 95%CI, 83-96%) and ventricular tachycardia (VT;92%; 95%CI, 87-96%) in studies with ≥3patients. Over a mean follow-up of approximately 5months, recurrence rates were 19% (95%CI, 12-28%) for PVCs and 21% (95%CI, 10-35%) for VT. The overall complication rate was 10% (95%CI, 5-17%) in studies with ≥3patients, with coronary artery spasm and conduction disturbances representing the most frequent adverse events.

conclusionVentricular PFA demonstrates high acute efficacy and encouraging mid-term outcomes, supported by preclinical evidence of favourable lesion penetration within scarred myocardium. Safety considerations-particularly coronary and conduction system effects-and the heterogeneity of preclinical evidence highlight the need for further investigation.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHeart VentriclesTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Premature ComplexesAnimalsHumansIrreversible Electroporation TherapyRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCatheter ablationElectroporationMeta-analysisPremature ventricular complexesPulsed field ablationRecurrenceSafetyVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID42615921
PMCPMC13574506

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.