ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2026
[Real-time OCT-guided strategies for optimization of precision and safety in vitreoretinal surgery].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative real-time optical coherence tomography (iOCT) enables a dynamic visualization of retinal structures at the micrometer level during vitreoretinal surgery and provides additional information that can directly influence the course of surgery. The aim of this study is the presentation of the clinical utility, limitations and current evidence base for the use of iOCT in vitreoretinal surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsA narrative review was conducted based on published studies, case series, subanalyses of prospective cohorts and systematic reviews addressing the use of iOCT in vitreoretinal procedures. The literature search was primarily performed using PubMed/MEDLINE.
resultsDuring epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, iOCT can assist in identifying an appropriate initiation site for membrane peeling. It also enables real-time assessment of the tissue response and facilitates verification of complete membrane removal by detecting residual fragments. In macular hole surgery, iOCT enables intraoperative visualization of hole morphology and reliable assessment of ILM flap positioning, including after fluid-air exchange. In retinal detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) surgery, iOCT not only facilitates the detection of residual subretinal fluid but also supports the evaluation of dissection planes and tractional membranes. DISCUSSION: Although many studies report a substantial added value of intraoperative OCT, a significant functional benefit, such as improvements in visual acuity outcomes, recurrence rates or complication rates has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. Nevertheless, the ability to dynamically assess retinal structures at micrometer resolution makes it possible to guide intraoperative decision-making, minimize iatrogenic tissue damage and enhance visualization, thereby providing a clear practical advantage, especially in complex cases or when microscopic visualization is limited. To date, limited evidence, high costs and heterogeneous technical implementations with variable clinical applicability have hindered widespread adoption of iOCT; however, in light of considerable technological advancements in recent years, increasing acceptance of this intraoperative imaging modality can be observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616121What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.