ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Usefulness of the phase angle for inflammation criteria of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition in critically ill patients.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Usefulness of the phase angle for inflammation criteria of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition in critically ill patients".Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Comment on "Usefulness of the phase angle for inflammation criteria of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition in critically ill patients" by Kariya et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is an international nutritional assessment approach, but its evaluation for reduced muscle mass and inflammation criteria remain undefined in critically ill patients. We hypothesize that the phase angle derived from a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) may be used as a GLIM inflammation criterion.
methodsICU patients expected to require ≥ 48 h of mechanical ventilation were stratified by the median phase angle. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the Barthel Index at discharge. Phase angle cut-off values were calculated for in-hospital death and the composite outcome of death or discharge with a Barthel Index < 70. Outcomes were compared between groups using the BIA-based GLIM (phase angle and skeletal muscle index) and the GLIM assessed by C-reactive protein (CRP) and computed tomography (CT).
resultsFifty-three patients were included. The phase angle was significantly associated with hospital stay and mechanical ventilation duration. The areas under the ROC curve of the phase angle for mortality and a Barthel Index < 70 were higher than those for SOFA, APACHE II and maximum CRP. The BIA-based GLIM identified malnourished patients with significantly poorer prognoses than CRP/CT-based GLIM. With phase angle thresholds of 2.67 and 4.03, the GLIM malnutrition showed a longer hospital stay, lower grip strength at discharge.
conclusionThe phase angle might be a suitable indicator for inflammation in the GLIM criteria, and appropriate BIA equipment providing both the phase angle and SMI might allow the initial assessment to be completed in a single step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42616142What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.