ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology2026
Efficacy of Aerobic Versus Non-aerobic Exercise in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on RCTs.
Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study reviewed relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to meta-analyze the effects of aerobic versus non-aerobic exercise in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
methodsRCTs comparing aerobic and non-aerobic exercise on cognitive function in patients with MCI were identified through searches of four databases-PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library-from January 2000 to July 2025, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Effect sizes were assessed using the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsA total of 15 studies were included, which comprised 1,192 older adults with MCI. Compared with the non-aerobic exercise group, the aerobic exercise group had greater peak oxygen uptake (MD = 3.99 ml/kg/min; 95% CI: (2.01, 5.96); P < 0.001), shorter trail making test-B (TMT-B) completion time (MD = -9.57 s; 95% CI: (-15.43, -3.70); P = 0.001), and improved delayed recall (MD = 0.90; 95% CI: (0.47, 1.33); P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores (both P > 0.05).
conclusionsAerobic exercise improves cognitive flexibility, cardiorespiratory fitness, and information consolidation and extraction in older adults with MCI compared with non-aerobic exercise, but it does not significantly affect overall cognitive function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.