Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42618687›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Association between financial toxicity and frailty among older patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study using COST and G8.

Momoko Kobayashi, Jun Miyazaki, Yutaka Sugawara, Eri Mannoji, Shin-Ichi Hisasue, Akinobu Katami, Hiroshi Yuki, Hajime Higuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Momoko KobayashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Jun MiyazakiDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Yutaka SugawaraDepartment of Medical Oncology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Eri MannojiDepartment of Medical Oncology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Shin-Ichi HisasueDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Akinobu KatamiDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Hiroshi YukiDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Hajime HiguchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan. higuchi-h@ihwg.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFinancial toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a critical challenge in cancer care. Older patients can be particularly vulnerable due to frailty-related impairments and accumulated treatment burden. This study aimed to evaluate FT and its association with geriatric vulnerability among older patients with cancer.

methodsWe conducted a single-center cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥ 65 years with cancer treated at a regional hospital in Japan. FT was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) instrument. Frailty-related vulnerability was evaluated using questionnaire-based assessments, including the G8 screening tool. Associations between the COST score and clinical variables were examined using univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses. Supplementary analyses were performed using the conventional G8 cutoff value (≤ 14).

resultsNinety-one patients aged ≥ 65 years were included. The median COST score was 25 (range, 8-44). Lower G8 scores were significantly associated with greater FT (Pearson's r = 0.345, p = 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, lower G8 scores (p = 0.048), poorer health-related quality of life (p = 0.036), and the receipt of multimodal therapy (p = 0.013) were independently associated with greater FT. Similar findings were observed when the G8 score was analyzed using the conventional cutoff value.

conclusionAmong older patients with cancer, FT was independently associated with geriatric vulnerability assessed by the G8 screening tool, in addition to health-related quality of life and treatment burden. The assessment of geriatric vulnerability may complement conventional socioeconomic indicators in identifying patients at an increased risk of FT.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessFrail ElderlyFrailtyNeoplasmsQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesComprehensive score for financial toxicityFinancial toxicityG8 screening toolGeriatric oncologyOlder patients with cancer

Identifiers

PMID42618687
PMCPMC13490239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.