Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42619581›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Effects of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) on Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function in Adults: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.

Ghazal Mashayekhi, Damoon Ashtary-Larky, Mehdi Karimi, Omid Asbaghi, Arvin Porkar Rezaeyeh, Zahra Shouhani, Ali Hosseini, Moslem Naderian

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghazal MashayekhiDepartment of Nutrition, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-4641
Damoon Ashtary-LarkyNutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-6110
Mehdi KarimiFaculty of Medicine, Bogomolets National Medical University (NMU), Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4388-0214
Omid AsbaghiCancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7740-4711
Arvin Porkar RezaeyehSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-2596
Zahra ShouhaniSchool of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Science, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ali HosseiniDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-3221
Moslem NaderianDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-9978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWalnuts (Juglans regia L.) are rich in bioactive compounds with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which may benefit cardiovascular health. However, the evidence regarding their effects on blood pressure (BP) and endothelial function remains inconclusive.

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of walnut consumption on systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), and endothelial function markers, including flow-mediated dilation (FMD), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in adults.

methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted through February 2026 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on intervention duration and walnut dosage. Dose-response associations were further examined using both linear and nonlinear modelling approaches.

resultsPooled analysis data from 36 RCTs showed no significant overall effect of walnut consumption on SBP (WMD: -0.65 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.61 to 0.30, p = 0.183) or DBP (WMD: -0.68 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.56 to 0.19, p = 0.125). However, significant reductions in DBP were observed in studies lasting ≥ 12 weeks. Walnut intake significantly increased FMD (WMD: 0.93%; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.59, p = 0.006), but had no overall significant effect on ICAM-1 (WMD = -0.56 ng/mL; 95% CI: -2.50 to 1.38; p = 0.571) and VCAM-1 (WMD: -8.68 ng/mL, p = 0.663). Subgroup analysis indicated a reduction in ICAM-1 in participants at high cardiovascular risk. The dose-response analysis supported a greater effect on ICAM-1 at higher walnut intakes.

conclusionWalnut supplementation may improve vascular health by reducing endothelial dysfunction and promoting a dose-dependent reduction in endothelial inflammation.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD420261461684.

Indexed as

Blood PressureEndothelium, VascularJuglansNutsAdultFemaleHumansIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1MaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1blood pressurecardiovascular riskendothelialflow‐mediated dilationICAM‐1Juglans regiameta‐analysisVCAM‐1walnut

Identifiers

PMID42619581
PMCPMC13491017

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.