Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42620086›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

DetectGxT: detecting gene-by-treatment interactions on molecular count phenotypes accounting for allelic additivity.

Yuriko Harigaya, Michael I Love, William Valdar

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuriko HarigayaDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-1879-5214
Michael I LoveDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-0545
William ValdarDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-0430

Funding

Modeling autism-associated gene-by-environment interactions in human brain organoidsOT2OD040436 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PIVEN, JOSEPH, STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2025 to 2025
$3.9M
Statistical Modeling of Multiparental and Genetic Reference PopulationsR35GM127000 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Valdar · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127000NIH HHS OT2 OD040436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Identifying the mechanisms by which genetic variants affect the molecular response to an applied treatment is important across multiple biological fields, and an effective approach to this end is interaction molecular QTL mapping. However, the statistical models commonly used to detect such gene-by-treatment interactions (G×T) are non-trivially misspecified, and this can lead to decreased power. Results: We developed an R software package, DetectGxT, that uses nonlinear regression to more accurately model the relationship between the genotype and the transformed molecular count phenotypes. It also optionally models donor or polygenic random effects. Simulations show that nonlinear regression can increase the power to detect interactions. In existing interaction expression QTL mapping data from primary human neural progenitor cells, nonlinear and linear regression approaches identified overlapping but distinct sets of gene-SNP pairs with significant G×T interactions. Overall, our results suggest an advantage of nonlinear regression over linear regression in detecting G×T interactions on molecular phenotypes. Availability: The DetectGxT software is available at https://github.com/yharigaya/detectgxt.

Identifiers

PMID42620086
PMCPMC13484507

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.