ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Genetic drivers of protein changes over time: Findings, considerations, and approaches in TOPMed cohorts and UK Biobank.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Age is a major risk factor for many diseases, but the biological processes driving aging are heterogeneous across individuals. Efforts to untangle differences between chronological and biological age have focused on identifying age-associated markers, such as 'omics clocks. Many 'omics features, including proteins, are strongly associated with age, and genetics contribute to variance in these measures. However, few studies have identified genetic drivers of interindividual variability in 'omics changes over time. Using longitudinal proteomics data (Olink 3k) from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), we calculated a protein slope for each individual (n=2,007) and protein (n=2,737) across 3 visits spanning 14-18 years, then conducted a genome-wide analysis for each slope, both with and without adjusting for baseline protein level. Subsets in UK Biobank (UKB; n=948) and CARDIA (n=1,328) with longitudinal proteomics data were used for replication. We considered additional methods for modeling of protein change and variability, including linear mixed models, SNP-by-age interactions, and variance quantitative trait loci. Without baseline adjustment, only 19 proteins (20 credible sets) had a slope pQTL in MESA, with poor replication in UKB and CARDIA. With baseline adjustment, 607 proteins (698 credivle sets) had a slope pQTL and over 70% replicated in CARDIA and/or UKB; such baseline adjusted models may, however, be subject to collider bias. Longitudinal and cross-sectional interaction models identified fewer than 14 pQTLs, suggesting they were generally underpowered; but 73% of proteins with a variance pQTL also had a slope pQTL. By examining effect direction concordance, replication rate, directed acyclic graphs, and signal overlap with other models we demonstrate that many baseline-adjusted slope pQTLs may be arising due to model misspecification or regression to the mean. Overall, our results highlight considerations for modeling strategies of change phenotypes and build on understanding of potential genetic mechanisms influencing interindividual proteome changes over time.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.