ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Pathophysiological mechanisms of benign prostatic obstruction in men with small prostate volume and the emerging role of ultra-minimally invasive prostatic urethral dilation: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men have traditionally been interpreted within a volume-based paradigm, in which benign prostatic enlargement is considered the principal driver of bladder outlet obstruction. However, a subset of patients with an operationally defined small prostate volume (≤30 mL) present with disproportionate symptom severity, indicating that prostate size alone is an insufficient determinant of disease burden. Objectives: To review the pathophysiological basis of benign prostatic obstruction in men with small prostate volume and to evaluate the emerging role of prostatic urethral dilation (PUD) within a pathophysiology-informed therapeutic framework. Evidence Synthesis: Small-volume BPO is increasingly recognized as a functionally driven condition involving multiple interacting processes. Enhanced α Conclusion: Small-volume BPO should be considered a distinct clinical phenotype in which functional mechanisms play a prominent role, although anatomical contributors may still coexist in selected patients. PUD may represent an emerging dilation-based strategy that is potentially relevant in this setting. High-quality randomized trials with long-term follow-up are required to define its durability, safety, and position in contemporary management algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.