Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42621058›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Bioinformatic tools for microbiome analysis: from raw sequences to biological insights.

Jenna Poelzer, David S Wishart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenna PoelzerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David S WishartDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth of microbiome research has been accompanied by an expanding but fragmented ecosystem of bioinformatic tools. Researchers now face a daunting array of software packages, pipelines, and web platforms spanning every stage of analysis, from quality control and taxonomic profiling to functional annotation and statistical interpretation. While this diversity offers flexibility, it also creates challenges in selecting appropriate tools and integrating them into coherent, reproducible workflows, particularly for researchers without formal computational training. This review presents a practical, workflow-oriented guide to microbiome data analysis, from raw DNA sequence processing to statistical interpretation and biological insight. We evaluate tools based on ease of use, methodological rigor, computational requirements, and community support, with particular attention to the trade-offs between command-line interface and web-based approaches. We cover both amplicon and shotgun metagenomic strategies for taxonomic and functional profiling, discuss reference database selection, and outline key statistical methods, including differential abundance testing and network inference. We also compare integrated platforms and web-based resources that lower barriers for non-computational researchers and discuss best practices for reproducibility and workflow design. Throughout, we highlight emerging technologies, including machine learning methods that are beginning to reshape the field. Overall, this review serves as a practical guide to navigating the microbiome bioinformatics landscape, helping bridge the gap between methodological complexity and the biological questions that drive microbiome research.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsmetagenomicsmicrobiomereviewsoftware

Identifiers

PMID42621058
PMCPMC13485926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.