ReviewPaediatric & neonatal pain2026
Methods of Assessing Postoperative Pain in Infants (0-12 Months): A Scoping Review.
Review in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infants undergoing surgery experience postoperative pain beyond acute short-lasting procedural pain and have variable analgesic needs. Assessing pain in this nonverbal population presents challenges for clinicians and parents. Given the short- and long-term effects of pain and its treatment, timely and accurate assessment of pain is vital. The aim of this scoping review was to map pain assessment methods used by clinicians and parents to assess postoperative pain in infants aged 0 to 12 months and describe their psychometric properties. The review was guided by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) five-stage framework. We searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL from January 2014 to March 2026 to retrieve eligible studies. Thirty-five studies (four systematic reviews, eight trials, and 23 original research studies) were included. We identified 20 different pain assessment methods used by clinicians. Postoperative pain categorization was inconsistent and lacked clear differentiation. There were inconsistencies in the duration, frequency, and documentation of pain scores. Several studies highlighted a discordance between pain scores, clinical judgment, and treatment decisions. Some tools had been used without being validated for postoperative pain or the age group studied. We found no studies of formal pain assessment methods used by parents. Observational subjectivity, the lack of current validity testing and standardization in methods, together with the multi-faceted nature of pain reflects the need for a multidimensional approach to assess pain. Research is warranted on continuous monitoring of postoperative pain in infants and family involvement in pain assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.