ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Unraveling the Crosstalk Between Ferroptosis and Cuproptosis for Rational Nanomedicine Design in Cancer.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ferroptosis and cuproptosis constitute two key metal-dependent regulated cell death pathways with distinct execution mechanisms, yet they exhibit intricate crosstalk revolving around glutathione (GSH) metabolism, iron‑sulfur cluster proteins, and shared regulators such as Nrf2 and FDX1. Co‑activating both pathways can overcome compensatory resistance and create a self‑amplifying lethal cascade. Nanomedicine provides an enabling platform to exploit this interplay through rationally designed nanotherapeutics that achieve spatiotemporally controlled metal ion delivery, tumor microenvironment‑responsive release, and integration with external stimuli or immunotherapy. This review delineates the molecular convergence of ferroptosis and cuproptosis, presents a framework for rational nanomedicine design based on prioritized disabling of antioxidant defenses and sequential activation strategies, and surveys representative nanoplatforms including copper‑based nanozymes, bimetallic nanoparticles, ionophore‑loaded regulators, and endogenous metal mobilizers. The synergy with photothermal, sonodynamic, and immune checkpoint blockade therapies is also discussed, highlighting immunogenic cell death induction and the conversion of "cold" tumors into "hot" ones. The work further clarifies current challenges and future perspectives toward clinical translation, thus providing a practical framework to inspire the rational design of next‑generation metal‑based nanomedicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.