ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Identifying and Addressing Distress in Cancer Care: A Study of Screening Outcomes and Referrals in Australian Oncology Outpatients.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePsychological distress is highly prevalent among oncology patients and represents an important unmet supportive care need. Yet referrals made following routine distress screening remain poorly understood. This study examined referrals following routine distress screening in outpatient oncology to assess how screening supports patient care, especially for psychological concerns.
methodsAll outpatient medical oncology distress screenings at a major metropolitan Victorian hospital from 1 December 2023 to 31 May 2024 were extracted from medical records. Screening was conducted with the NCCN distress thermometer (DT), problem list and additional custom items. Patient characteristics, screening uptake, and referral following screening were analysed.
resultsOf 850 distress screening encounters offered to 773 patients, 82 (9.6%) were declined, leaving 768 completed screening encounters. Among respondents, 53.6% reported clinically significant distress (DT ≥ 4) and 60.4% reported psychological concerns. 35.8% (n = 275) of screenings resulted in at least one referral. Patients with more distress and greater patient-reported need for support were more likely to be referred (both p < 0.001). However, only a small proportion of referrals following screening targeted psychological concerns directly, with just five directed to specialist mental health services.
conclusionsDistress and psychological concerns are highly prevalent in outpatient oncology, yet referral following screening often does not align with concerns reported. Most referrals are made to external services, limiting integration with oncology care. Improving referral pathways and enhancing access to mental health services within oncology settings are critical steps towards better meeting patients' psychological needs and ensuring that distress screening translates into meaningful, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.