Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622358›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Co-Producing Training Resources to Improve Healthcare Experiences for Young Women and Reduce Gendered Health Inequalities.

Ana Alonso Curbelo, Emma Rigby, Alison Hadley, Sigi Joseph, Yvonne Kerr, Bethany Spain, Amy Simmons, Una Macfadyen, Sarah Dillon, Mar Sánchez Fernández and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ana Alonso CurbeloUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Emma RigbyAssociation for Young People's Health, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-9859
Alison HadleyUniversity of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK.
Sigi JosephRCGP Clinical Lead for Women's Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Yvonne KerrNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Bethany SpainClackmannanshire Third Sector Interface (CTSI), Alloa, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5156-7148
Amy SimmonsGlasgow University Environmental Sustainability Team (GUEST), Glasgow, UK.
Una MacfadyenNHS, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah DillonThe Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK.
Mar Sánchez FernándezThe Young Women's Movement, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-2498
Laura TinnerUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3936-072X

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/X004392/1NIHR School for Public Health Research NIHR204000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung women report feeling dismissed or unheard in healthcare settings. These experiences lead to mistrust, healthcare avoidance and ultimately contribute to gendered health inequalities.

objectiveThis project aimed to co-produce with young women and key partners (e.g., healthcare professionals, experts in women's health and inequalities, third sector organisations and policymakers), resources to support healthcare professionals to recognise power imbalances and adapt practice to better meet young women's needs. DESIGN AND CONTRIBUTORS: Using an Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) framework, we conducted participatory creative workshops (one online and two in-person) with three groups of young women (n = 24, aged 16-25). Workshops used arts-based, accessible activities to explore both positive and negative healthcare interactions. Insights were then presented to 15 healthcare professionals in an online workshop, to co-design practical resources.

resultsThe co‑design workshops led to the development of two linked resources: a co‑produced 2‑min animation and an accompanying training session for healthcare professionals. Young women identified three priorities for improving their healthcare experiences: (1) feeling heard and respected, (2) having agency and choice, and (3) continuity of care. Healthcare professionals emphasised the need for short, engaging and non‑judgemental resources. These insights informed the animation, which depicts themes drawn from young women's experiences. The training session, delivered and co‑created with young women who received facilitation training, incorporated structured engagement with the animation.

conclusionThis project demonstrates the value of co-design in shaping meaningful, practical resources intended to support young women's healthcare experiences. The final product is now being shared with healthcare educators and services. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This project was co-produced with young women and healthcare professionals from inception to dissemination via a Steering Committee and co-production workshops. Interest holders from varying perspectives co-designed the animation by shaping content and focus. Facilitation skills training was offered to all participating young women, with those who took part supported to remain involved through a young trainers' group. Healthcare professionals contributed insights that informed the resource's design, tone and messaging, ensuring it remained relevant and feasible within busy healthcare contexts. Steering Committee members were also invited to comment on manuscript drafts and support the development of this paper, including through co-authorship.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansWomen's HealthYoung Adultco‐productionexperience‐based co‐designgendered health inequalitiesparticipatory methodspatient and public involvementyoung women's health

Identifiers

PMID42622358
PMCPMC13492181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.