ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Walkability in older age: built environment factors and function-sensitive assessment in urban areas].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Walkability describes how supportive a neighbourhood is for walking and is a key concept for promoting mobility, physical activity and social participation in older age. However, existing approaches do not adequately reflect the specific needs of older adults, especially in the presence of functional limitations. This article outlines how walkability can be further conceptualised, measured in a function-sensitive way and empirically examined in an urban context.The paper presents an age-specific operationalization framework for walkability based on the authors' previous work and a Delphi consensus study. It includes three dimensions: residential environment and transport infrastructure, accessibility of destinations and meeting places, and attractiveness and safety of the environment. A central feature is the systematic consideration of the interaction between functional status and environmental demands.Using the planned WALK project in Munich as an example, the article illustrates how these indicators can be applied in a municipal mixed-methods study. The design combines qualitative interviews, walk-and-talk assessments, expert interviews and GIS-based analyses. The aim is to identify barriers and facilitators of everyday walking among older adults and to derive recommendations for health-promoting, age-sensitive urban planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.