ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Clinical significance of WES-defined ERBB2 amplification in resectable colorectal cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHER2 amplification is demonstrated to influence response to therapy and outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its role in resectable CRC remains unclear. This study investigated the prognostic impact of WES-defined ERBB2 amplification and its association with adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) efficacy and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in resectable CRC.
methodsData from 3607 patients with resectable CRC from the GALAXY study were analyzed. HER2 amplification was defined using ERBB2 copy number alterations based on whole exome sequencing of tumor specimens. We analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) in WES-defined ERBB2 amplified CRC, evaluating ACT benefit and the correlation between ERBB2 copy number and ctDNA status.
resultsNo significant difference in DFS was observed between those with and without WES-defined ERBB2 amplification in a univariate (P = 0.0659) or a multivariate analysis (P = 0.2300). Among patients with pathological stage III, ACT was associated with improved DFS in the non-amplified subgroup (HR 0.67, P = 0.0002), particularly in the subgroup of patients with early post-operative (2-10 weeks following surgical resection) ctDNA-positivity (HR 0.27, P < 0.0001), whereas no clear association was detected in the small amplified subgroup; however, the ACT-by-ERBB2 amplification interaction was not statistically significant. While WES-defined ERBB2 amplification correlated with higher early post-operative ctDNA positivity (P = 0.0486), ERBB2 copy number did not associate with recurrence or levels. However, early post-operative ctDNA positivity strongly predicted poor DFS in patients with WES-defined ERBB2 amplification (HR 15.26, P < 0.0001).
conclusionsWES-defined ERBB2 amplification was not identified as a significant adverse prognostic factor in resectable CRC, unlike early post-operative ctDNA status. The limited number of amplified cases precluded a reliable assessment of whether WES-defined ERBB2 amplification modifies the association between ACT and DFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.