Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42622848›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

Automated deep learning-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of meningiomas.

Daniel de Wilde, Olivier Zanier, Aron Alakmeh, Stefanos Voglis, Ulf C Schneider, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E Staartjes, Gustav Burström, Raffaele Da Mutten

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel de WildeMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. daniel.dewilde@usz.ch.
Olivier ZanierMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Aron AlakmehMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanos VoglisMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulf C SchneiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Luca RegliMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlo SerraMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. victor.staartjes@ki.se.
Gustav Burström *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Raffaele Da Mutten *Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience & Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. raffaele.damutten@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors and are frequently monitored over extended periods. Volumetric assessment typically requires manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and associated with interrater variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based model for the automated segmentation of meningiomas and associated peritumoral edema on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

methodsWe trained a standard nnU-Net deep learning model on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR MRI scans from 100 patients treated at the University Hospital of Zurich. The model was then externally validated on 88 cases from the meningioma SEG-Class dataset from the Cancer Imaging Archive. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard index, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance.

resultsThe model achieved mean Dice scores of 0.87 ± 0.23 for meningioma segmentation and 0.63 ± 0.38 for peritumoral edema in internal cross-validation. On the external validation set, the model achieved scores of 0.86 ± 0.17 for meningioma segmentation and 0.31 ± 0.35 for edema.

conclusionThe deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in segmenting meningiomas and modest performance for peritumoral edema. These results support the potential utility of automated segmentation tools in clinical workflows. Future work should focus on validating model performance across larger multi-center datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningMeningiomaSegmentation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.