ReviewActa neurologica Belgica2026
Recognising and differentiating paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after severe traumatic brain injury: a practical diagnostic approach.
Review in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a syndrome seen in a subgroup of survivors of severe acquired brain injury, most often traumatic, in which episodic surges of sympathetic activity occur together with motor over-activity, typically dystonic posturing. It is associated with longer intensive care stays, more complications, and worse outcomes, yet remains under-recognised. The difficulty is twofold: its core features overlap with the common emergencies of the intensive care unit, so that sepsis, seizures, pulmonary embolism, and drug-related syndromes are reasonably considered first; and no biomarker or imaging finding confirms it. This review offers a practical two-part approach for the patient with severe traumatic brain injury: how to recognise the syndrome positively, using the consensus definition and the PSH Assessment Measure, and how to differentiate it from its mimics. The differential is extended beyond the conditions usually listed to include autonomic dysreflexia, iatrogenic and substance withdrawal, endocrine emergencies, non-convulsive status epilepticus, unrelieved pain, and drug-induced autonomic instability, and the limitations of the evidence are examined rather than assumed. Attention is given to the pitfalls that cause delay and to the frequent coexistence of PSH with conditions such as sepsis. The evidence is drawn into a stepwise framework which has not been prospectively validated and is offered as an educational aid rather than a clinical guideline. Throughout, the emphasis falls on serial reassessment and dynamic reasoning, since substantial diagnostic uncertainty commonly persists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42622998What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.