ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Clinical Laboratory Terminology Standardization for Semantic Interoperability Using a Large Language Model-Based Agent: Methodological Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Semantic interoperability, the ability of disparate health information systems to exchange and consistently interpret clinical data, is a cornerstone of modern digital health, underpinning cross-institutional research, real-world evidence generation, and global health surveillance. Laboratory tests constitute one of the richest clinical data sources, yet multilingual variation and institution-specific naming conventions severely impede their standardized integration across systems. Objective: We propose LabBridge, a large language model (LLM)-based agentic framework designed to standardize laboratory tests to the Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) standard, enabling cross-lingual semantic interoperability while minimizing reliance on language-specific rules and manual curation. Methods: LabBridge integrates linguistic normalization, hybrid retrieval (combining domain-adapted embeddings with the LOINC ontology structure), and constrained LLM reasoning within an agentic workflow that enforces terminological consistency and traceability. We evaluated the framework on 2 real-world laboratory datasets from emergency department patients, one in Chinese and one in English, representing cross-lingual and cross-institutional heterogeneity. Performance was assessed across 5 LLMs and compared with vector-based baseline (BGE-M3, Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches, using mapping accuracy against a curated reference set of clinically relevant LOINC core codes as the primary metric. Results: At full coverage (Top@100%), LabBridge achieved 81% to 90% LOINC mapping accuracy across 5 LLMs on both Chinese and English datasets, outperforming all baseline methods ( Conclusions: LabBridge demonstrates that embedding LLMs with an ontology-aware, agent-coordinated architecture enables effective standardization of laboratory data. By unifying semantic retrieval, linguistic normalization, and constrained reasoning, the framework accelerates the terminology standardization process by transforming expert effort from manual code lookup to candidate verification. These findings offer a practical pathway toward scalable, auditable semantic interoperability in health care ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.