Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42624596›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Promoting the use of evidence (PROMOTE) in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: protocol for a multicentre, cluster-randomised, phase IV implementation trial.

Natasha A Lannin, Laura Jolliffe, Katharine Scrivener, Louise Ada, Catherine Dean, Tammy Hoffmann, Dominique A Cadilhac, Elizabeth Lynch, Leonid Churilov

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natasha A LanninSchool of Translational Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Natasha.Lannin@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345
Laura JolliffeBayside Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-9442
Katharine ScrivenerSchool of Translational Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Louise AdaFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Catherine DeanSchool of Medicine and Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tammy HoffmannInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, City of Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-8548
Dominique A CadilhacStroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8162-682X
Elizabeth LynchCollege of Health and Enablement, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Leonid ChurilovDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFewer than half of patients receive evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Implementation science interventions may improve use of guidelines by clinicians; however, it is not yet known whether they lead to evidence-based stroke rehabilitation practice. We aim to determine the effect and cost-effectiveness of a champion-led implementation package (PROMOTE) to increase adherence to best practice guidelines for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multistate, multicentre, cluster-randomised, implementation phase IV trial with concealed allocation, blinded measurement and intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted. The PROMOTE package includes appointing an internal champion, local audit and feedback, interactive education tailored to gaps in knowledge and skill, and a decision-aid to support intervention selection. To be eligible, centres delivered rehabilitation to at least 20 stroke patients in the preceding year. Assuming 35% baseline adherence to guidelines, 14 centres (n=238) will be recruited to provide 80% power to detect a 30% absolute difference with a two-sided α=0.05. An embedded process evaluation and economic analysis will assess implementation and costs. The primary outcome is the proportion of people with stroke who are documented to receive guideline-recommended upper limb rehabilitation interventions by 6 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported clinician behaviour change, upper limb therapy outcomes at the end of intervention, costs and cost effectiveness (eg, incremental cost per quality adjusted life year). Process evaluation outcomes include reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance (sustainability). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number 89725 (NMA), 26 April 2023) with each participating site providing ethical clearance prior to the commencement of the trial. Findings will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extended for cluster-randomised trials and in peer-reviewed journals, and communicated to stakeholders and the public. Understanding and characterising the active ingredients of effective implementation will inform scalable strategies to improve stroke rehabilitation practice, health outcomes and the equitable delivery of evidence-based care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial is currently recruiting and is registered at https://www.anzctr.org.au/.ID: ANZCTR 12623000608662 (UTN U1111-1292-8705), 2 June 2023.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeClinical trialsImplementation SciencePhysical Therapy ModalitiesREHABILITATION MEDICINEStrokeStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42624596
PMCPMC13504908

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.