ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2026
Diagnosis of hypochondroplasia: international Delphi consensus recommendations.
Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypochondroplasia is a skeletal dysplasia caused by pathogenic variants in FGFR3 and characterized by disproportionate short stature and relative macrocephaly. Diagnostic uncertainty remains common, particularly in early childhood and in individuals with mild or atypical presentations, leading to delayed diagnosis, inconsistent management, and challenges in counselling and care planning. Individuals can be affected by medical complications and psychosocial consequences and have unmet needs for multidisciplinary care. To address these unmet needs, an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts and patient representatives convened to develop consensus-based diagnostic recommendations using a modified two-stage Delphi approach, with a predefined consensus threshold of 70% of respondents rating statements ≥70 (on a scale of 0 to 100). The panel integrated clinical, anthropometric, radiographic, neuroimaging and genetic criteria to define diagnostic categories that can be applied across diverse health-care settings globally. Major and minor diagnostic criteria are proposed, alongside guidance on the appropriate use of molecular testing, radiographic evaluation and brain magnetic resonance imaging. These recommendations provide a practical framework to help standardize timely and accurate diagnosis of hypochondroplasia in clinical practice and research.
Identifiers
42625006What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.