ArticleThe plant genome2026
Integrating genomic selection into potato breeding: A comparison of genotyping platforms and cross-environmental predictions.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a powerful tool for accelerating genetic gain in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding, particularly for complex traits. In this study, three practical aspects of GS implementation in a potato breeding program were examined. First, the predictive ability of GS models was evaluated for three key traits (total yield, marketable yield, and specific gravity) using two elite potato populations with shared ancestry, tested across seven location-year environments. Two cross-validation strategies were used to reflect practical breeding scenarios: predicting unphenotyped lines in known environments and predicting clonal performance in unknown environments. Four models were evaluated, two of which included genotype-by-environment interactions. Tuber specific gravity showed higher and more consistent prediction accuracy across environments, supporting the evidence that it is a more stable trait. Second, the impact of genotyping platforms and marker density on GS performance were examined, as the two populations were genotyped using two different targeted sequencing platforms: Flex-seq (22K loci) and DArTag (4K loci), sharing ∼4K common loci, that allowed direct comparison. Prediction accuracies were comparable across platforms, indicating that both are suitable for GS implementation, with the choice depending on breeding goals, cost, and throughput considerations. Finally, the long-term impact of GS on genetic gain was assessed through stochastic simulation of a 30-year breeding pipeline, comparing conventional phenotypic selection with GS-assisted selection scenarios. GS scenarios achieved higher long-term genetic gains, though practical deployment should consider both cost and breeding objectives. Our findings for the three aspects of this study support the integration of GS into potato breeding programs, while highlighting key considerations for its effective implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.