ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Immune profiling by bulk RNA-seq and multiplex immunofluorescence imaging across multiple cancer types.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune cell populations within the tumor microenvironment (TME) critically determine cancer prognosis and therapeutic response. Although multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) provides spatial immune profiling and bulk RNA sequencing methods offer comprehensive cellular characterization, comparative studies between these complementary methodologies remain limited across diverse tumor types. Methods: Patient samples from various tumor types, obtained from either primary or metastatic sites, were collected. For each patient, two samples were analyzed, one for mIHC and one for RNA-seq (xCell2). Both methodologies were intended to quantify immune cell populations including CD4 and CD8 T cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), B cells and macrophages within the TME. Samples were stratified by origin according to biopsy procedure and tissue block characteristics. The primary objective was to assess concordance between methodologies for immune cell density estimation, while exploratory analysis evaluated liver-specific TME differences and immunotherapy (IO) exposure in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Method correlations were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results: Among 298 patient specimens spanning 20 tumor types, overall correlation between mIHC and xCell2 deconvolution was modest ( Conclusions: Our work highlights the value of integrating spatial (mIHC) and transcriptomic (xCell2) approaches to optimize immune profiling accuracy in complex tumor tissues. CD8 T-cell populations showed the strongest methodological concordance, establishing their priority as a robust candidate biomarker for immune activation to be used in further clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.