ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Inhibitory receptor states, immune homeostasis and the benefit-risk boundary of cancer checkpoint blockade.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer treatment, but its clinical success depends on releasing antitumor immunity without collapsing peripheral tolerance. Biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, mismatch-repair deficiency and tumor mutational burden capture only selected aspects of this balance and provide limited guidance on immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This Review examines inhibitory receptor states as dynamic readouts of the therapeutic window in cancer immunotherapy. Rather than treating PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, VISTA and NKG2A as isolated abundance markers, we discuss how their signaling intersects with CD3, CD28 and cytokine-driven activation, immune-cell differentiation, tissue localization and homeostatic restraint. We further consider how checkpoint blockade converts these circuits into either tumor control or organ-specific immune injury. Evidence from tissue pathology, blood immunomonitoring, single-cell and spatial multi-omics, routine laboratory markers, imaging and emerging host-immune surrogates is integrated into a longitudinal, regimen-specific framework. We argue that clinically useful models should jointly estimate response and toxicity risk, distinguishing reinvigoratable antitumor states from fixed dysfunction and autoreactive vulnerability. Such an approach could support patient selection, regimen tailoring, early toxicity surveillance and more precise use of combination immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.