Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626264›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of methodology2026

Glucagon-like receptor-1 agonists and impotence: A meta-analysis.

Hyder Osman Mirghani, Asawir Mohammed AlQurashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyder Osman MirghaniInternal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 51941, Saudi Arabia. s.hyder63@hotmail.com.
Asawir Mohammed AlQurashiInternal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 51941, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucagon-like peptide receptors-1 agonists (GLP-1 agonists) have revolutionized the treatment of obesity and diabetes due to their potent effects on weight and glycemic control, and cardiorenal protection. However, emerging reports and post-marketing surveillance have raised concerns regarding erectile dysfunction (ED) or impotence in a subset of male patients.

aimTo assess the association between GLP-1 agonists, ED, total (TT) and free testosterone (FT), sex hormone binding globulins (SHBG), luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH).

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science in November and December 2026 for articles examining the association between GLP-1 agonists and ED, with no publication date restriction. However, only articles published in the English language were eligible. The terms used were GLP-1 agonists, ED, semaglutide, liraglutide, ozympic, tirzepatide, dulaglutide, and Impotence.

resultsOne hundred seventy-two articles were found; after removing duplicates, 63 remained, of which 12 full texts were screened, and 7 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Seven studies involving 237 males were included. GLP-1 agonist therapy improved ED score with a significant statistical difference, MD = 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-3.83. A significant increase was found regarding TT, SHBG, and FSH, MD 73.04, 95%CI: 16.91-129.17, MD 7.00, 95%CI: 1.71-12.30, and MD 0.46, 95%CI: 0.01-0.91 respectively.

conclusionNo significant differences were evident regarding the FT, and LH. GLP-1 agonists significantly improved ED, TT, SHBG, and FSH in males, no effects were observed on FT, and LH; larger randomized trials are needed.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemErectile dysfunctionErectile dysfunction impotenceGlucagon-like peptide receptors-1 agonistsImpotenceMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID42626264
PMCPMC13491145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.