Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42626292›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of nephrology2026

Renal artery stenting for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A review of contemporary data.

Andrew E Warfield, Christopher S Morris, Anant D Bhave, Geoffrey M Scriver, Alan Massouh, Joshua Kallen, Richard T Solomon, Bill S Majdalany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew E WarfieldDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Christopher S MorrisDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Anant D BhaveDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Geoffrey M ScriverDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Alan MassouhDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Joshua KallenDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Richard T SolomonDepartment of Nephrology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Bill S MajdalanyDepartment of Radiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, United States. bill.majdalany@uvmhealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal artery stenting has been less frequently performed following the results of the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions trial. In this trial, stenting demonstrated no benefit over medical therapy in a composite outcome including mortality as well as cardiovascular and renal events. However, these findings must be interpreted in the context of the study population, which included many patients less likely to benefit from intervention due to relatively mild renal artery stenosis, as well as less severe hypertension and renal dysfunction. More recent investigations have focused on identifying subgroups of patients who may benefit from revascularization. Identified subgroups include patients with high systolic blood pressure, diastolic hypertension, worsening kidney function, greater antihypertensive burden, flash pulmonary edema, and mild-range proteinuria. Many of these variables illustrate a clinical picture of a patient with severe ischemic kidney disease leading to problems with hypertension and volume regulation that has not yet irreparably damaged the renal parenchyma. Deciding which patients fit into this picture, and therefore should be stented, presents a challenge. This review synthesizes the current evidence surrounding these predictive variables and explores how they may be integrated into clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Flash pulmonary edemaHypertensionRapidly declining kidney functionRenal artery stenosisStenting

Identifiers

PMID42626292
PMCPMC13491224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.