ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2026
Redox biology in PCOS: Biomarkers, mechanistic networks, and targeted interventions (Review).
Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a lifelong endocrine‑metabolic disorder affecting 11‑13% of women worldwide. Beyond ovulatory dysfunction, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian morphology, PCOS is tightly linked to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and increased cardiometabolic risk. Converging evidence places oxidative stress at the core of PCOS pathophysiology, but current evidence should be interpreted in a phenotype‑aware manner. Obese, hyperandrogenic, and Rotterdam phenotype A/B presentations generally carry a heavier systemic oxidant‑inflammatory burden than phenotype D, whereas lean PCOS may still exhibit clinically relevant local ovarian redox abnormalities despite a milder metabolic background. Mitochondrial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and androgen excess amplify reactive oxygen species generation, while granulosa‑cell mitochondrial depolarization, apoptotic signaling, and NF‑κB‑driven inflammation degrade follicular fluid quality, oocyte competence, and embryo development. However, the literature remains heterogeneous because assay platform, specimen type, cycle phase, adiposity, and treatment exposure all influence biomarker reproducibility and comparability. In addition, most human research supports association, whereas stronger causal support comes from interventional or mechanistic research showing that modulation of NADPH oxidase 4, antioxidant pathways, mitochondrial function, or sex hormone‑binding globulin‑related oxidative signaling can alter key reproductive and metabolic phenotypes. To improve translational value, the present review prioritizes a core biomarker panel spanning serum/plasma and follicular fluid, distinguishes systemic oxidative markers from local ovarian microenvironmental markers, and critically compares antioxidant and metabolic interventions by evidence level, sample size, endpoint type, and major limitations. Recent phenotype‑oriented and multi‑omics reearch is further integrated to propose a biomarker‑guided framework for phenotype‑stratified trials and precision management of PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.