Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627084›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2026

Mechanics of compression-driven morphogenesis.

Jue Yu Kelly Tan, Chii Jou Chan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jue Yu Kelly TanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.ORCID 0009-0004-5650-7668
Chii Jou ChanMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117411.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-3949

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore T2EP30222-0026National Research Foundation Singapore NRF-MSG-2023-0001National University of Singapore
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical forces shape multiscale biological processes across many living systems, ranging from cell proliferation and apoptosis, to tissue folding and pattern formation. In recent years, tissue pressure has emerged as a fundamental regulator of morphogenesis across animal and plant kingdoms. However, a fundamental understanding of the definition and origin of tissue pressure remains lacking. In this Review, we synthesise how tissue pressure is generated from diverse sources, including tissue growth, actomyosin contractility, topological defects and fluid- or extracellular matrix-driven swelling, and how it influences developmental processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, tissue folding and pattern formation. We also discuss how homeostatic pressure governs tissue growth and competition, while highlighting the cellular and molecular signalling pathways implicated in compressive stress responses. Finally, drawing on examples from animal, plant, bacterial and organoid systems, we outline emerging experimental and computational approaches to measure and manipulate tissue pressure in vivo, and identify key challenges in dissecting compression-specific mechanosignalling pathways.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularMorphogenesisAnimalsApoptosisBiomechanical PhenomenaCell ProliferationExtracellular MatrixHumansSignal TransductionStress, MechanicalCompressive stressMechanotransductionMorphogenesisTissue mechanicsTissue pressure

Identifiers

PMID42627084
PMCPMC13571816

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.