ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Dosing of Antiseizure Medications in Patients with Renal or Hepatic Impairment.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ten newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) approved since 2000 and selected for this review (cenobamate, brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate, lacosamide, perampanel, fenfluramine, ganaxolone, cannabidiol, stiripentol, and rufinamide) have broadened treatment options for drug-resistant epilepsy. However, concurrent renal or hepatic impairment alters drug disposition through diminished clearance, shifted protein binding equilibria, accumulation of active metabolites, and variable dialytic removal that standard dosing fails to accommodate. Despite the rising clinical overlap of epilepsy with chronic kidney and liver diseases, consolidated prescribing guidance for these agents in organ-impaired populations remains limited. This narrative review synthesizes pharmacokinetic data from pivotal development programs together with current regulatory labeling issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) through 2025 for all ten agents across graded severities of renal and hepatic impairment. Brivaracetam, rufinamide, and cannabidiol proved minimally susceptible to renal decline, whereas eslicarbazepine acetate required no hepatic dose adjustment in mild-to-moderate disease. Conversely, cenobamate and perampanel necessitate strict dose caps or avoidance in severe organ dysfunction, and stiripentol is precluded in any degree of organ impairment owing to unpredictable nonlinear Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Regulatory discrepancies between FDA and EMA labeling were identified for all ten agents, notably divergent hepatic dose caps for perampanel and cenobamate, conflicting renal recommendations for fenfluramine, and discordant guidance for eslicarbazepine acetate in severe renal impairment. These agents exhibit no uniform class effect in organ impairment; prescribing must be governed by agent-specific disposition profiles, organ-function severity, and free-drug monitoring for highly protein-bound agents like perampanel and ganaxolone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627450What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.