ArticleGenes & genomics2026
Comparative identification of abiotic stress-responsive differentially expressed genes in chickpea using unsupervised machine learning, and traditional meta-analysis.
Article in Genes & genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClimate change poses a growing threat to chickpea production through abiotic stresses such as drought, heat, and salinity. Understanding the molecular stress response of chickpea is critical for improving resilience and minimizing yield loss.
objectiveTo identify robust, stress-responsive differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in chickpea under abiotic stress (drought, salt, and salinity) by comparing three complementary large-scale RNA-seq data analytical approaches.
methodsThis study employed three complementary approaches, traditional meta-analysis, conventional statistical testing, and unsupervised machine learning, on publicly available chickpea RNA-seq data to identify robust differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under drought, salt, and salinity stress. Available RNA-seq datasets were integrated regardless of variety, tissue type, or geographical origin. The HDBSCAN clustering algorithm was optimized through distance metric evaluation and grid search hyperparameter tuning, with Euclidean distance optimal for drought and salinity and Manhattan distance for salt stress.
resultsStandard deviation-based feature engineering on the top 3,000 most variable genes yielded the most stress-specific DEGs, with high fold enrichments for cytochrome P450, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and heme binding under drought. For salt and salinity stress, limited sample availability constrained the feature space, reducing HDBSCAN clustering resolution and DEG specificity demonstrating that ML performance scales markedly with sample size and feature richness, where DESeq2 showed comparatively greater robustness. For the drought dataset spanning 11 bioprojects, Limma-voom and DESeq2 with bioproject correction both returned non-specific housekeeping enrichment, in direct contrast to the stress-specific signal recovered by HDBSCAN, empirically demonstrating the superior biological specificity of unsupervised ML-based outlier detection in heterogeneous multi-bioproject data.
conclusionCompared to HN-score meta-analysis, HDBSCAN demonstrated superior stress specificity by leveraging complex high-dimensional expression patterns, offering a powerful and scalable strategy for stress-responsive gene identification in chickpea and other crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627607What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.