ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Gut microbiota signatures associated with spermatogenic capacity and sperm retrieval outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize gut microbiota composition in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and evaluate associations with sperm retrieval outcomes following microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE).
methodsIn this prospective cohort, fecal samples from 39 azoospermic men (obstructive azoospermia [OA], n = 14; NOA, n = 25) were analyzed. NOA patients were stratified into successful (NOA ( +)) and unsuccessful (NOA ( -)) sperm retrieval groups. Full-length 16S rRNA sequencing (PacBio) was performed. Microbial composition, diversity, and differential taxa were analyzed using QIIME2, DADA2, and linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the predictive performance of candidate markers.
resultsCompared with OA, NOA patients showed reduced Bacteroidota and increased Proteobacteria, indicating gut dysbiosis. Alpha diversity was similar between groups, whereas beta-dispersion revealed greater microbial variability in NOA. Within the NOA cohort, the NOA ( +) group exhibited a higher Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidota ratio and distinct microbial profiles. Finegoldia magna and other Firmicutes taxa were enriched in NOA ( +), whereas Bacteroidota-associated taxa predominated in NOA ( -). The Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidota ratio predicted successful retrieval with an area under the curve of 0.76, and Finegoldia magna abundance showed high specificity, although these findings were exploratory.
conclusionGut microbiota composition differs by azoospermia etiology and is associated with mTESE outcomes. Enrichment of Finegoldia magna and increased Firmicutes in NOA ( +) suggest a potential role of the gut-testis axis. Gut microbiota profiling may represent a non-invasive correlate of sperm retrieval success, although these exploratory findings require validation in larger independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42629513What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.