ArticleBMC nursing2026
Comparative assessment of nurses' knowledge and practice on medical device-related pressure injury management in India and Europe: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectiveThe challenge of applying knowledge of Medical Device Related Pressure Injuries (MDRPIs) to clinical practice persists worldwide. This study examined the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) of nurses dealing with MDRPIs in two disparate organizational ecosystems, India and Europe. This was done to better understand the systemic factors that contribute to gaps in nursing competency as a result of disparate organizational ecosystems.
methodsThe study used a 20-point validated KAP scale with a sample of 334 registered nurses located in Europe and in India. Gaps within the KAP scale were analyzed through domain-specific disparities with demographic variables as covariates.
resultsNurses in Europe scored substantially higher on the KAP scale (17.61 ± 2.14) compared to the Indian nurses (10.94 ± 2.85; p < 0.005). The largest gap was in Clinical Practice (2.64 ± 1.44 vs. 5.30 ± 1.03; p < 0.005). Subgroup analyses showed that the performance gaps were unrelated to the demographic variables in question. Interestingly, the Indian cohort had a higher percentage of postgraduate nurses, thus indicating that higher levels of education do not necessarily correlate to higher levels of Clinical Practice.
conclusionThe management of MDRPIs is a product of the nursing environment as determined by the organizational structures of the health system, rather than the capability of the individual nurse. Closing the gap in competency requires movement away from higher levels of Academic Qualifications, and a concentration on the nursing Clinical Environment through the development and standardization of institutional clinical protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.