ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
A multi-level machine learning pipeline for prediction and prioritization of hybrid insulin peptides in type 1 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid insulin peptides (HIPs) are neoepitopes involved in type 1 diabetes (T1D), but their complete repertoire remains unknown. The vast combinatorial space makes experimental screening unfeasible and requires bioinformatics-based prioritization. We developed a multi-level machine learning pipeline for ranking HIP candidates. First, 36 physicochemical and junction-specific features were computed for a reference library of 240 HIPs with known enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) reactivity, and a baseline Ridge regression model was trained. Next, all possible HIP candidates with 7-9 amino acid residues per fragment were generated from eight pancreatic β-cell secretory granule source proteins, including insulin chains and C-peptide, islet amyloid polypeptide, chromogranin A, neuropeptide Y, and two secretogranins, yielding 1,057,374 candidates. For each source protein, a local weighted XGBoost (Extreme Gradient Boosting) model was trained using Ridge-score-derived pseudo-labels together with weighted ELISPOT-derived and literature-derived reference HIPs. Finally, anchor-calibrated re-ranking was performed in the global model using cosine similarity to positive anchors (n = 46) and negative anchors (n = 210). The Ridge model achieved 5-fold out-of-fold R² = 0.711 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.967. The global model produced a prioritized list of 40 HIP candidates, five per source protein. The highest ranks were observed for candidates with right fragments from neuropeptide Y, secretogranins 1 and 2, islet amyloid polypeptide, and chromogranin A. Candidates carrying the insulin fragment on the right side were systematically down-ranked, suggesting asymmetry in HIP formation. The proposed pipeline reduces the HIP search space from more than one million sequences to a limited set of candidates for experimental validation and provides a framework adaptable to other chimeric neoepitopes in autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.