ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Practical specification and application of implementation strategies to cognitive-behavioral research and practice.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a first-line intervention for anxiety and mood disorders, yet its reach has not been fully realized due to incomplete implementation in routine community practice. The field of implementation science has the potential to improve integration of CBT in the settings and populations that most stand to benefit. Numerous strategies have been proposed to improve implementation, but are not consistently specified in the research, particularly in CBT research and practice. The present narrative review is intended to demonstrate to mental health clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers the ways in which implementation strategies can be utilized and specified to improve implementation of CBT, using a previously developed implementation strategy classification scheme as a guide. We describe the categories of strategies, provide exemplars of their use in CBT research and implementation efforts, and summarize the implications of each category type for CBT practice and research. We conclude with a hypothetical implementation study illustrating optimal use and specification of these strategies targeting implementation of CBT for OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.