ArticleInterventional cardiology (London, England)2026
Drug-coated Balloons in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Results from the Drug Eluting Technologies Evaluation & Current Trends (DETECT) Survey.
Article in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are increasingly used in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but there are limited data available on practice patterns. Our survey evaluated the views of interventional cardiologists with respect to various clinical and technical aspects of DCB angioplasty. Methods: A voluntary, online survey involving 13 questions - the Drug Eluting Technologies Evaluation & Current Trends (DETECT) Clinical Practice Survey - was conducted in two waves: a census of Irish interventional cardiologists in April 2025 and an onsite survey at the EuroPCR Congress in May 2025. The question topics included indications for DCB use, device selection factors, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and intravascular imaging use. Respondent characteristics were recorded. Results: A total of 136 respondents (126 consultants, 10 fellows) from 39 countries (60 Ireland, 76 EuroPCR) participated in the survey. The survey revealed that most consider a DCB for in-stent restenosis (ISR; 99%), small vessel disease (95%) and bifurcation lesions (77%). A lower proportion consider a DCB strategy in chronic total occlusion (29%), any vessel size (21%) or acute coronary syndrome (17%). No differences by level of interventional experience (>10 years, <10 years or fellow) (χ²=10.35; p=0.11). DCB comprised 1-10% of annual PCI for half of the respondents (55%); most respondents (82%) anticipated an increase in their use. Paclitaxel DCBs were widely available (93%) but sirolimus DCBs less so (55%). DAPT duration post-DCB in chronic coronary syndromes was commonly prescribed for 3 months (43%) or 6 months (33%). Most use intravascular imaging for 21-50% of their DCB cases. Conclusion: This survey suggests that DCBs have been widely adopted by interventional cardiologists for the treatment of ISR and small vessel disease, with anticipated growth in the next 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.