ArticleF&S reports2026
Efficacy and safety of desogestrel/ethinylestradiol 150/20 flexible extended regimen (FREEDOM 150/20) in dysmenorrhea: phase 3 study in Japan.
Article in F&S reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of a user-driven flexible extended regimen of desogestrel 150 μg/ethinylestradiol 20 μg (DSG/EE 150/20) for the treatment of primary or secondary dysmenorrhea in women from Japan. Design: Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study with an open-label extension period. Subjects: Two hundred and eleven women with regular menstrual cycles and primary or secondary dysmenorrhea in 21 centres across Japan. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive DSG/EE 150/20 μg or placebo once daily for 24-80 consecutive days, with each treatment period followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval. After the double-blind phase (three 28-day cycles), participants entered an open-label phase (≤10 cycles); participants initially receiving placebo were switched to DSG/EE. Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoint was change from baseline through day 84 in total dysmenorrhea score (TDS). Secondary endpoints included number of days with dysmenorrheic pain, patient global impression of change (PGI-C), treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM-9), quality of life (QoL) measured by the 36-item short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-36v2), and safety outcomes. Results: In the 211 participants randomized to DSG/EE (n = 159) and placebo (n = 52), the mean (SD) age was 32.3 (7.56) years, and body mass index was 21.94 (3.18). A significant reduction in TDS from baseline through day 84 was observed in the DSG/EE group vs. placebo (least squares mean: -2.50 vs. -0.84; treatment difference [95% confidence interval: -1.67 [-2.08, -1.26]). The number of days with mild, moderate, and severe pain were 12.9 vs. 12.1, 4.8 vs. 6.5, and 0.8 vs. 1.1 days in the DSG/EE vs. placebo group. Over 80% of DSG/EE-treated participants reported improvement in PGI-C scores compared with <30% on placebo. TSQM-9 global satisfaction and effectiveness least squares mean scores were higher with DSG/EE (63.69 vs. 36.62 and 62.86 vs. 35.5) compared with placebo. DSG/EE improved SF-36v2 scores, particularly in the physical component summary, bodily pain, and role-physical domains. Overall, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were intermenstrual bleeding, nasopharyngitis, and nausea. No deaths were reported during the entire study period. Conclusion: DSG/EE 150/20 effectively reduced dysmenorrhea severity, improved SF-36v2 scores and treatment satisfaction, offered dosing flexibility, and was well-tolerated with a safety profile consistent with combined oral contraceptives. Trial Registration: jRCT2031230276 (https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2031230276).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.