ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
The heterogeneous and dynamic immune-tumor interface in breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BCa) progression is driven by ongoing interactions between evolving tumor cells and the host immune system. Antitumor immunity is not the same across all BCa subtypes and depends on the quality, localization, and functional state of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Highly immunogenic subtypes, such as triple-negative and HER2-positive (+) BCa, generally show stronger immune infiltration and inflammatory signaling, whereas estrogen receptor-positive tumors more often display immune-desert or immune-excluded phenotypes with limited immune cell infiltration and effector activity. Effective immune surveillance requires not only the presence of immune cells, but also their suitable spatial localization and functional capacity. Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells mediate tumor control when they infiltrate tumor areas, whereas stromal-related limitations or functional exhaustion reduces their efficacy. This dysfunction is reinforced by regulatory populations, including FoxP3+ regulatory T cells and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages, which establish suppressive networks that inhibit effector responses. Within this framework, T-cell immunity is organized into distinct functional states, including stem-like progenitor exhausted T cells, which maintain their immune potential, and effector T cells responsible for cytotoxicity, which support local surveillance. Tertiary lymphoid structures further enhance coordinated immune activation by serving as intratumoral sites of antigen presentation and lymphocyte priming. Immune escape arises through T-cell exhaustion, impaired antigen presentation, tumor-intrinsic signaling changes, and stromal barriers that restrict infiltration. Collectively, these mechanisms generate a regulated, but often tumor-supporting immune environment. BCa progression therefore, reflects a balance between immune activation and suppression, governed by spatial organization and cellular stratification within the TME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.