ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026
Clinical and demographic factors associated with coexisting carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger in Kazakhstan.
Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger (TF) are common hand disorders that frequently coexist. Most available data originate from North American, European, and East Asian populations, whereas data from Central Asian countries remain limited. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of concurrent CTS and TF and identify associated demographic and clinical factors in a clinical cohort from Kazakhstan. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with CTS, TF, or both conditions. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical variables were analyzed. Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with concurrent CTS and TF. Results: A total of 138 patients were included. Among them, 82 (59.4%) had CTS, 48 (34.8%) had TF, and 8 (5.8%) had both conditions. Significant differences between groups were observed for sex (p = 0.001), ethnicity (p < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.008), thyroid disease (p = 0.010), and hormone therapy (p = 0.030). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was strongly associated with concurrent CTS and TF (OR = 72.96; 95% CI 2.41-2208.9; p = 0.014), whereas increasing age was associated with lower odds of coexistence (OR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.63-0.92; p = 0.005). Conclusions: Concurrent CTS and TF were identified in a limited number of patients in this cohort. Diabetes mellitus and age were associated with their coexistence. These findings provide clinical data from an understudied Kazakhstani population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.