ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Frailty in Parkinson's disease: time to integrate it into treatment decision-making?
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frailty is increasingly defined as a multidimensional clinical condition whose prevalence rises with advancing age, extending across multiple medical specialties and exhibiting significant sex- and gender-related differences. Chronic diseases, including neurological conditions such as Parkinson's disease (PD), are key contributors to frailty, possibly through shared mechanisms. Conversely, frailty adversely influences clinical outcomes and disease trajectories, increases mortality risk and alters the risk-benefit profile of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes current evidence on the aetiologies, clinical and instrumental assessment, emerging fluid biomarkers, and therapeutic implications of frailty in PD. Conventional frailty tools, including the Frailty Index and Fried phenotype, are useful but lack specificity in this specific population, notably because PD-related symptoms overlap with frailty criteria. A multimodal approach integrating gait and balance analysis, cognitive testing, dysautonomia assessment, sarcopenia screening, dysphagia evaluation, and nutritional markers may improve risk stratification. Emerging biomarkers, including inflammatory cytokines, albumin, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, vitamin D, sarcopenia-related markers, neurofilament light chain, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), may further capture biological vulnerability, although validation remains limited. Frailty substantially modulates PD treatment decisions by increasing susceptibility to adverse effects, polypharmacy, falls, cognitive complications, and procedural risk. Frailty should therefore be systematically integrated into pharmacological prescribing, deprescribing, rehabilitation, neuropalliative approaches, and selection (as well as timing) of device-aided therapies. Routine frailty assessment, independent of chronological age, may support more individualized, patient-centred PD care, prioritizing functional independence, safety, quality of life, and minimisation of treatment burden alongside conventional motor management.
Identifiers
42631724What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.