ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Informal carers' perception on perspective taking when reporting as proxies about someone else's health.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInformal carers ('proxies') are often asked to report on the health of individuals who cannot self-report, either from their own ('proxy-proxy') or the patient's ('proxy-person') perspectives. It remains unclear which perspective proxies find most useful. Understanding this is important for designing measures that proxies can complete. We conducted an exploratory study on which perspective proxies find most useful and why, when reporting pain and physical function in dementia and symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS).
methodsThis study used data from two cross-sectional online surveys: one for proxies of people with MS and another for people with dementia. Proxies were asked to indicate which perspective they found most useful and why for communicating symptoms in MS, and pain or physical function in dementia, to healthcare professionals (HCPs). Quantitative responses were summarised using percentages; qualitative responses were analysed using content analysis.
results55 proxies reported on MS symptoms, 29 on pain in dementia, and 33 on physical function in dementia. The most selected perspectives were: 35% (19/55) proxy-proxy for MS symptoms, 38% (11/29) proxy-person for pain and 39% (13/33) either of the perspectives for physical function. Proxy-person was valued for empathy and person-centredness, especially in reporting pain and MS symptoms. Proxy-proxy was appreciated for objectivity and reducing conflict, particularly in physical function. Using either perspective was considered most useful for balancing views and reducing misinterpretation in both conditions.
conclusionProxies' most useful perspectives vary slightly by domain and condition. Incorporating an understanding of how proxies approach the challenge of reporting may improve measure design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.