Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631854›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Contagious yawning is stronger in wolves than in dog-admixed wolves.

Federica Amici, Katja Liebal, Linda Oña, Mattia Iacuzzi, Tina Altdörfer, Arne Gretschzel, George Kamanga, Manon Delaunay, Paolo Ciucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federica AmiciLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. amici@eva.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-1067
Katja LiebalLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Linda OñaLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Mattia IacuzziDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology ''Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Tina AltdörferLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Arne GretschzelLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
George KamangaLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Manon DelaunayLife Sciences, Institute for Biology, Human Biology and Primate Cognition, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Paolo CiucciDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology ''Charles Darwin", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural contagion occurs when the behaviour of one individual elicits the same behaviour in another individual observing the event, and it is considered one of the fundamental mechanisms promoting group coordination and cohesion in social species, including humans. Empirical research on behavioural contagion has focused primarily on yawning and has shown evidence of it in several animal species. Here, we studied behavioural contagion in 2 groups of captive wolves (N = 20) and 3 groups of captive dog-admixed wolves (N = 13). We conducted behavioural observations of naturally occurring yawning events and monitored the yawning behaviour of the other group members in the two minutes following each event. Our results showed that, in both admixed and non-admixed wolves, individuals who had the opportunity to observe the initial yawn were significantly more likely to yawn within the subsequent two minutes than those who had not observed the event. Crucially, this effect was stronger in non-admixed than in admixed wolves. Furthermore, individuals that were more socially integrated were more likely to elicit behavioural contagion in both admixed and non-admixed wolves. In contrast, neither individual rank nor dyadic relationship quality between the yawner and the observer mediated the probability of contagion. By revealing variation in behavioural contagion patterns between admixed and non-admixed wolves, this study provides insights into how introgressive hybridization with domestic species may influence mechanisms underlying social coordination and pack cohesion in wolves.

Indexed as

Imitative BehaviorSocial BehaviorWolvesYawningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID42631854
PMCPMC13499727

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.