Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42632029›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks for gene regulatory network inference.

Noor Jamal Alkhateeb, Mamoun Awad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noor Jamal AlkhateebCollege of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Street, Asharij - Shiebat Al Oud, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Mamoun AwadCollege of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Street, Asharij - Shiebat Al Oud, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, 15551, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gene regulatory network (GRN) represents a complex web of genetic interactions that governs cellular functions and responses to environmental stimuli. Understanding these intricate relationships is crucial for advancing developmental biology, disease modeling, and therapeutic discovery. With the growing interest in graph-based approaches, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for GRN inference, offering the ability to capture high-dimensional dependencies and topological structures within gene networks. This survey presents the first comprehensive review of GNN-based methods for GRN inference, analyzing 16 state-of-the-art approaches. We categorize these methods based on their underlying architectures, inference strategies, and computational frameworks. Additionally, we provide a critical evaluation of their strengths, limitations, and real-world applicability. Unlike prior surveys that focus on either scRNA-seq or deep learning broadly, this work systematically unifies graph architectures, learning paradigms, and data regimes under a common benchmarking framework. By identifying key challenges-such as scalability, interpretability, and dataset limitations-this survey aims to guide both life scientists in selecting appropriate computational models and researchers in developing next-generation GRN inference techniques using graph-based learning.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGraph Neural NetworksHumansbulk RNA-seqcausal inferencegene regulatory networksgraph attention networksgraph convolutional networksscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID42632029
PMCPMC13499457

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.