ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026
Testing Front-of-Package Labels on Packaged Food for Adult and Adolescent Population in Bangladesh.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) is a promising tool to improve consumer understanding of unhealthy foods and reduce diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, evidence on the effectiveness of different formats in Bangladesh is limited. Objectives: This study evaluated the impact of 4 FOPL formats-warning label (WL), health star rating (HSR), multiple traffic light (MTL), and guideline daily allowance (GDA)-on consumers' ability to identify products high in nutrients of concern and their intention to purchase these products. Methods: A nationally representative randomized controlled trial was conducted across all 8 divisions of Bangladesh among adolescents (10-18 y) and adults (19-60 y). Participants were randomly assigned to 5 arms (control, WL, HSR, MTL, or GDA) and evaluated using mock packaged foods. Primary outcomes included correct identification of foods high in sugar, sodium, saturated fat, or calories and purchase intention. Secondary outcomes included perceived unhealthiness, perceived message effectiveness (PME), and cognitive elaboration. Tertiary outcomes assessed reactions to FOPL formats. Results: WLs showed the greatest impact on correct product identification among adolescents and adults. Compared with the control (14%-15%), correct identification was significantly higher with WLs (68%-73%) and MTL (62%-65%) ( Conclusions: Interpretive FOPL systems outperform noninterpretive labels in improving consumer understanding, with WLs showing the strongest effects. These findings support the use of mandatory WLs as an effective policy to promote healthier food choices and address diet-related NCDs in Bangladesh.This study was preregistered at the Open Science Framework on February 5, 2025. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8ZDK6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.