ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2026
Clonal evolution from primary to locally recurrent rectal cancer reveals recurrence-acquired potentially actionable alterations in treatment-naïve tumors.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) occurs in 6-10% of patients after curative surgery. It is often regarded as a simple residual disease, yet accumulating evidence suggests that LRRC is biologically distinct from primary tumors. Clonal evolution in matched primary-recurrence pairs not exposed to preoperative therapy has not been systematically investigated.
methodsWe analyzed formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 15 matched pairs of primary and locally recurrent rectal cancers not exposed to preoperative therapy using targeted next-generation sequencing of 22 colorectal cancer-related genes, including TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and FGFR family members. Tumor areas were selectively collected to ensure high tumor purity. Mutations were classified as shared or unique, and variant allele frequencies (VAFs) and clonality (VAF > 30%) were evaluated.
resultsAmong 415 pathogenic mutations, 12/15 pairs (80%) harbored shared driver alterations, with TP53 shared in 11 (73%). Shared mutations showed higher VAFs in recurrences than in primaries (median 57.1% vs 47.6%; p = 0.003). Unique mutations were modestly higher in recurrences (median 5.4% vs 4.8%; p = 0.048). Clonal mutations exhibited greater VAFs at recurrence (median 86.4% vs 49.8%; p = 0.048), while the numbers of clonal mutations were comparable (32 vs 32). Potentially actionable alterations involving MET and FGFR family genes were observed in recurrent lesions in a subset of cases, including some detected at clonal levels.
conclusionsLRRC is not merely residual disease but an evolutionarily progressed tumor entity characterized by persistence and dominance of truncal drivers with acquisition of clinically relevant alterations. Profiling recurrent lesions may guide therapy as primary tumor profiling alone may miss potentially actionable alterations present in recurrent lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42633600What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.