Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42634022›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2026

Safety Assessment of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus OF44, a Previously Isolated Human-origin Probiotic Candidate.

Fangping Yang, Lei Zhang, Pu Yang, Yongping Xin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fangping YangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, People's Republic of China.
Lei ZhangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, People's Republic of China.
Pu YangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, People's Republic of China. yangpu@sxu.edu.cn.
Yongping XinSchool of Life Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, People's Republic of China. xinyongping@sxu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0044-0255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus is one of the most extensively studied and well-characterized probiotic species. The strain L. rhamnosus OF44, originally isolated from a healthy female fecal sample, has shown particular promise for its ability to modulate the vaginal microenvironment through pH reduction and inflammation control. However, its comprehensive safety profile remains unclear. In this study, we systematically evaluated the safety of the previously identified strain L. rhamnosus OF44 through a series of standardized assessments. Genomic analysis (99.9% coverage) revealed the absence of virulence genes, while identifying four genes associated with resistance to chlorhexidine and copper ions; these have been demonstrated to be intrinsic to L. rhamnosus. Additionally, phenotypic analysis, including minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, reverse mutation testing, β-hemolysis assessment, biological amines and D-lactate production (0.571 ± 0.005 mM), and genetic stability testing, revealed no adverse traits. Finally, in vivo studies (acute oral toxicity at up to 3 × 10¹² CFU/kg, with LD₅₀ > 15.0 g/kg·BW) confirmed that L. rhamnosus OF44 exhibited no detectable acute oral toxicity and pathogenicity. These results indicate that L. rhamnosus OF44 has a favorable safety profile under the tested conditions, although further chronic toxicity and human studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusProbioticsAnimalsFemaleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity Tests

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.