ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing surgical site infection control systems: evaluating operating room ventilation system effectiveness in public hospitals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adherence to ventilation standards/guidelines in hospital operating rooms is essential for preventing surgical site infections, controlling exposure to anesthetic gases and surgical smoke, and maintaining indoor air quality. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ventilation systems in 64 operating rooms across seven major hospitals. A cross-sectional design was used with stratified random sampling. Data were collected via a standardized checklist covering various aspects of the operating room ventilation system. Statistical methods included descriptive analysis, Kruskal-Wallis tests, parametric and non-parametric Item Response Theory (IRT), and cluster analysis. Effect sizes and reliability measures (Cronbach's Alpha, Mokken's H) were calculated. The mean total score was 18.5 (SD = 5.2), with wide variability among hospitals. High-scoring hospitals like H-4 (M = 25) and H-1 (M = 23) outperformed low-scoring ones like H-6 (M = 9.0). Subscale analysis showed ventilation and air filter deficiencies in low-performing hospitals. Parametric IRT revealed high item discrimination (e.g., QuestionV4, a = 1.2; QuestionE8, a = 1.5), and non-parametric IRT confirmed strong scalability (H = 0.58). Cluster analysis identified four performance groups. Compliance with ventilation standards/guidelines differs significantly among hospitals. Regular assessments and targeted improvements are crucial, particularly in underperforming settings. High-performing hospitals provide valuable benchmarks for identifying best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.