ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2026
National adverse event reporting for medical devices in Israel, 2013-2024.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-market surveillance systems are essential for identifying medical device-related adverse events and ensuring patient safety. In Israel, the Ministry of Health has operated a national medical device reporting system for decades. The system is modeled on United States and European regulatory frameworks, although the Medical Devices Act has not yet entered into force.
methodsFollowing formal approval, anonymized aggregate data were obtained from the Ministry of Health Medical Device Division for reports submitted between 2013 and 2024. The dataset included annual reporting volumes, report classification as adverse events or Field Safety Notices, reporting source, and event type (death, injury, or malfunction), where available. Availability varied across the study period; analyses were therefore restricted to years in which the relevant variables were recorded.
resultsOverall reporting volumes increased over time, from 406 in 2013 to 874 in 2024. Non-linear trends were observed, with declines in 2017, 2020, 2022, and 2024. Since 2019, adverse events accounted for approximately 61.9-75.5% of reports annually, while Field Safety Notices comprised 21.4-33.3%. From 2022 onward, most adverse events were classified as injuries, increasing from 87.1% in 2022 to 89.8% in 2023 and remaining high at 89.1% in 2024. Malfunctions accounted for 10.3% of adverse events in 2022, 7.9% in 2023, and 8.5% in 2024, whereas deaths remained relatively stable at 2.2-2.5%. Reporting was dominated by registration holders (70-80%), primarily importers and distributors, followed by manufacturers, with consistently limited contributions from healthcare institutions and voluntary reporters.
conclusionsThis analysis of Israel's national medical device reporting database provides an empirical baseline for assessing the structure and functioning of the country's post-market surveillance system. Increasing reporting activity and improved event classification indicate system maturation. The predominance of reports from registration holders, alongside more limited participation by healthcare institutions and voluntary reporters, points to areas for continued development. The following measures would strengthen post-market surveillance in Israel: full implementation of the legal framework; clearer reporting responsibilities and pathways: targeted guidance and training; electronic reporting and analytical tools; improved event documentation; and structured feedback and transparency mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.