ArticleRenal failure2026
Sleep disturbance in CKD: patient‑prioritized outcomes, management, and perceptions - a multicenter mixed-methods study in Australia.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSleep disturbances are common in chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet patient priorities, reporting behaviors, and experiences of sleep management remain poorly understood. This study explored perceived causes of sleep disturbance, patient-prioritized sleep outcomes, and experiences of reporting and managing sleep problems.
methodsA multicenter, convergent mixed-methods study of adults with CKD stage 4-5, including those receiving kidney replacement therapy. Participants were recruited from four nephrology units across three Australian states. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparison, and interview data using thematic analysis, with findings integrated through triangulation.
resultsA total of 234 participants completed the survey and 14 participated in interviews. Participants were predominantly male (67%), aged over 60 years, and receiving hemodialysis (62%). Overall, 73% were classified as poor sleepers. Fragmented sleep (56%), nocturia (44%), and restless legs syndrome (27%) were the most common contributors. Feeling refreshed on waking and satisfaction with sleep were the highest-priority outcomes, ranked above social participation, ability to work, and hospital admissions. Forty-one percent reported that their treating team had never asked about sleep, and among those who raised concerns, almost one-quarter received no management. Pharmacological therapy was the most commonly reported clinical management (33%), despite a preference for nonpharmacological strategies. Nine percent used a wearable sleep tracker; with a further 41% willing to try one.
conclusionIn this cohort, sleep disturbances were common, under-recognised, and inconsistently managed. Management approach does not fully align with patient preferences. Greater access to nonpharmacological approaches and wearable technologies may support monitoring and engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.