ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Multimodal contrastive learning for integrating molecular representations and cellular phenotypes in drug-target interaction prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurate prediction of drug-target interactions (DTIs) is fundamental to drug discovery and mechanistic understanding. While deep learning has advanced computational DTI prediction, most existing methods rely primarily on molecular structural representations, including drug structures and protein sequences, while overlooking cellular phenotypes that reflect downstream biological effects. Cell Painting enables high-content morphological profiling that captures systems-level responses to chemical and genetic perturbations but remains underutilized in DTI modeling. Integrating molecular information with cellular phenotypes offers an opportunity to improve both predictive performance and biological interpretability.
resultsWe propose a two-stage contrastive learning framework integrating drug structures, protein sequences, and Cell Painting morphological profiles into a unified embedding space. Stage 1 learns modality-specific representations independently from structure-based and image-based data; Stage 2 aligns these via multi-positive contrastive learning to bridge molecular structural information with cellular phenotypes. Cross-modal retrieval achieves median Recall@10 values of 0.77 (random split) and 0.33 (scaffold split), outperforming bilinear and random baselines. In external DTI prediction on the BIOSNAP dataset, our model achieves an AUC of 0.92 with image-based representations and 0.90 under structure-only settings, surpassing existing methods. Model interpretation via integrated gradients reveals pathway-specific morphological signatures associated with drug targets, providing biologically interpretable insights into drug mechanisms. AVAILABILITY: https://github.com/YJRubyLai/Unified-DTI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.