Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42635547›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2026

Evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)" for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Aline Batista Maurício, Viviane Martins da Silva, Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer Cavalcante, Larissa Giardini Bruni, Sue Ann Moorhead, Elizabeth Swanson, Karen Dunn Lopez, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de Barros

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aline Batista MaurícioPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6506-3737
Viviane Martins da SilvaORCID 0000-0002-8033-8831
Agueda Maria Ruiz Zimmer CavalcanteCollege of Nursing, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3910-2162
Larissa Giardini BruniPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-4837
Sue Ann MoorheadCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-9909
Elizabeth SwansonCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6681-6294
Karen Dunn LopezCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9700-941X
Marcos Venícios de Oliveira LopesDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5867-8023
Alba Lucia Bottura Leite de BarrosPaulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-3492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the evidence of internal structure validity of the nursing outcome (NO) "Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Response: Adult (0412)" of the NOs classification for critically ill COVID-19 patients.MethodsA methodological study focused on internal structural validation, part of a multicenter study, was carried out in the intensive care units of two hospitals in Brazil, from 2020 to 2021. Patients in critical condition due to COVID-19 subjected to mechanical ventilation for more than 24 h and with an invasive device attached to the ventilator in the final phase of the weaning process were evaluated. The researchers used an instrument containing sociodemographic and clinical data and a physical examination of the clinical conditions based on the indicators of the NO. An exploratory factor analysis was performed, using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin method, in addition to other additional adjustment indexes. Reliability was assessed using McDonald's omega, Cronbach's alpha, and Gutmann's lambda 6 coefficients.FindingsAmong the 20 indicators evaluated, 6 were included in the final structure organized into two factors, the first being composed of spontaneous respiratory rhythm, spontaneous respiratory depth, discomfort, and difficulty breathing on own, and the second of anxiety and fear. This two-dimensional structure explains about 62.9% of the total variance. The final structure showed good internal consistency, suggesting that the indicators were measuring the same construct.ConclusionsThe structure proposed for the NO was shown to be reliable and valid for practice and research to evaluate patients with COVID-19 in the final phase of ventilatory weaning.Implications for nursing practiceThe findings are expected to provide robust evidence for clinical nursing practice. The proposal to organize this NO into dimensions could facilitate the nurse's clinical reasoning and make the monitoring of indicators more organized and faster for the evaluation of patients in ventilatory weaning.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical IllnessVentilator WeaningAdultBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRespiration, ArtificialCOVID-19respiratory systemstandardized nursing terminology

Identifiers

PMID42635547
PMCPMC13503986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.